Committed (after repeating the same block for both calls, as Vesa suggested
on IRC).
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 07:37:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Okay, I think I got what you mean. So how about this one?
>
> --
> Robert Millan
>
> The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
> how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
> still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
> 2008-11-29 Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * disk/ata.c (grub_ata_pciinit): Handle errors rised by
> grub_ata_device_initialize() calls.
>
> Index: disk/ata.c
> ===================================================================
> --- disk/ata.c (revision 1929)
> +++ disk/ata.c (working copy)
> @@ -542,6 +542,16 @@ grub_ata_pciinit (int bus, int device, i
> {
> grub_ata_device_initialize (controller * 2 + i, 0, rega, regb);
> grub_ata_device_initialize (controller * 2 + i, 1, rega, regb);
> +
> + /* Most errors rised by grub_ata_device_initialize() are harmless.
> + They just indicate this particular drive is not responding, most
> + likely because it doesn't exist. We might want to ignore specific
> + error types here, instead of printing them. */
> + if (grub_errno)
> + {
> + grub_print_error ();
> + grub_errno = GRUB_ERR_NONE;
> + }
> }
> }
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
