Hello! Indeed. You are quite correct concerning GRUB as it is described. However given the fluid state of GRUB2 I am reluctant to try it out unless I can convince my hardware to play along. -- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The Force will be with you always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:grub-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Felix Zielcke > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:59 AM > To: 'The development of GRUB 2' > Subject: RE: rename grub to grub-legacy ? > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:grub-devel- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pavel Roskin > > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 5:37 PM > > To: The development of GRUB 2 > > Subject: Re: rename grub to grub-legacy ? > > > > I believe Okuji wanted to use a different naming scheme, that would put > > "grub2" or "grub-legacy" above trunk. You may want to check it to > > avoid > > moving things twice. > > Right, there was already a topic about the SVN structure I totally forgot about: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2008-07/msg00248.html > > > All the above notwithstanding, I'm still skeptical about the whole > > moving idea based on my experience with other projects. Repositories > > are for developers and should be used in the way that minimizes > > troubles > > for developers rather than reduces the entry barrier for newbies. > > I think grub-legacy is dead from developer POV or am I wrong? > > But you're right if we change things then we should do this only once, > so I'm now not that sure what to do now. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel