On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 01:24:16PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 14:42 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > > > > grub_dprintf itself refers to that as "condition". I'd personally prefer > > "channel" though. What do others think? > > I used now just channel, if others have better suggestions a > s/channel/whatever shouldn't be too difficult. > The only grub_dprintf calls that I haven't touched now are in > fs/reiserfs.c > It uses "reiserfs" and "reiserfs_tree", I wasn't sure if I should merge > them or make a channel2="reiserfs_tree"
Or perhaps debug_channel, to make it less ambigous? Looks fine to me, but please wait a bit to see if others have any opinion on this. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
