----- Original Message ----
From: Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Monday, 1 September, 2008 3:46:32 PM
Subject: Re: Windows,grub and grub2

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Viswesh S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>

Hi,

Do you mean the result is still the same after you apply my patch ? I
check the source code of grub legacy, the handling should be exactly
the same. Are you using the official branch grub 0.96, or some package
with modification ?

You can also check memory at 0x7be, this should be the partition table
in mbr, %esi would point to the boot partition.

-- 
Bean

Hi,

The result is still the same after the patch.

I am using the official grub2 released package 1.96.

In that the chainloader patch wasnt there.Hence applied that according to your 
inputs as in the mail.

I checked the memory at 0x7be, which is the same as 0x1be in the mbr.

The first partition was already active also.

Also as I mentioned,what about the code for the int 13 extension and and their 
functionalities for 2,41,42.

Is there any change there.

Otherwise I am not really sure, why grub is able to boot,but grub2 not.

Viswesh
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel



      Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on 
http://help.yahoo.com/l/in/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/tools/tools-08.html/
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to