On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 06:21:10PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:35:38PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> >> - grub_printf (" [Linux-EFI, setup=0x%x, size=0x%x]\n",
> >> + grub_printf (" [Linux, setup=0x%x, size=0x%x]\n",
> >>
> >
> > I looked at the other Linux loaders, and to be consistent this would have to
> > be "Linux-bzImage" instead. I propose using that then
> What about printing the Linux version number there?
Not bad. If we do this, I suppose we'll also want to do the same for the
other Linux loaders.
What does everyone think?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
