On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:51:25AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:16 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > Furthermore, I had a look and some of the x86_64 versions are just stubs > > that > > include the i386 one. > > > > Why don't we handle this like Linux? They ship a single directory and use > > #ifdefs where appropiate. That enforces consistency in the dir layout. > > I think we can do it. i386 and x86_64 could be joined into one "x86" > architecture with common headers and sources. Perhaps the users should > still use i386 and x86_64 in configure, but the code should be mostly > common.
Ok, but I think the i386->x86 rename would be overkill. We're already using i386/ headers on x86_64 (for example, when building util/ stuff in grub-pc). It doesn't hurt if we continue doing that IMHO. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
