Hi, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that we have lzma compression, we should probably consider making > another release in a week or two. > > Before it happens, I'd like to add a configure test for working target > compiler, so that users of pure x86_64 machines are not surprised by a > message that "start" and "_start" are not found. > > By the way, that check could be generalized to allow more symbols, such > as "Ltext0" on Cygwin. It would be great if GRUB 1.97 compiled on > Cygwin out-of-box. Cygwin lacked some lzo development files, but we > don't need them anymore. > > All warnings for i386-pc have been fixed, but perhaps I'll look at other > targets if I have time. Also, Valgrind finds some memory leaks, that we > may want to fix now. Did all this happen? Is NEWS and distlist and whatever is required for a release up-to-date? In that case, Okuji, do you object to a release? Bean suggested we release before we continue with his ideas regarding the modularity of the code. Okuji (and others), can you please review the patch I sent in for handlers in the thread related to the elimination of normal mode? -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
