On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 14:20 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:37:03PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 04:14 +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > > > > > I took a look at lzma 4.32.6. All code in liblzmadec is licensed with > > > LGPL 2.1 > > > or any later version. So where is the problem? > > > > Indeed, the "any later version" provision is there. It wasn't mentioned > > in the original discussion. Then we are fine. > > Maybe I didn't check in the right place. Anyway, the matrix at: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility > > seems to indicate LGPL 2.1 and GPL 3 are compatible.
You are right. From http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/lgpl-2.1.html: 3. You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. To do this, you must alter all the notices that refer to this License, so that they refer to the ordinary GNU General Public License, version 2, instead of to this License. (If a newer version than version 2 of the ordinary GNU General Public License has appeared, then you can specify that version instead if you wish.) -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
