On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 31 May 2008 17:21:25 Robert Millan wrote:
>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:09:50PM +0800, Bean wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > I think the method is sound; what I'm complaining about (and it's not
>> > > something specific to your patch) is that we're referring to two
>> > > different things by the same name ("root"), and even put them in the
>> > > same variable.
>> > >
>> > > In the initialization phase, "root" is the device that contains our
>> > > GRUB directory.
>> > >
>> > > Afterwards, "root" is the device we're currently accessing (be it for
>> > > loading fonts, backgrounds, Linux images, whatever).
>> > >
>> > > If "root" means "just a placeholder for whatever device we're acessing
>> > > at the moment", then it would make sense, but in our code (i.e. in the
>> > > names we're giving to commands and functions) it's assumed to mean "the
>> > > device containing /boot/grub".
>> > >
>> > > So what do we want to do with this? Should we have different variables
>> > > for each thing (and in that case, is "root" for initial stage or for
>> > > grub.cfg) or should we use "root" as a placeholder for any path
>> > > reference, and adjust our function names etc to reflect that?
>> >
>> > root is used in loaders as well, we shouldn't change its name. We
>> > could use another variable to store the root device at initial stage,
>> > it could actually be useful as it always points to the boot media.
>> > Perhaps we can name it "boot". What's your idea ?
>>
>> I'm fine with "boot". I'm CCing Okuji; would like to make sure he doesn't
>> have any objections (I think it was he who gave it this layout).
>
> "boot" is used for a command, so it is very confusing to use the same name for
> a variable. If you want to have this kind of variable, please find another
> name. I myself have no idea.
Hi,
No problem, I can find another name.
BTW, there are now two schemes for locating device at boot, the
environment block and robert's uuid device, which one do you favor, or
is there other scheme you prefer ?
--
Bean
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
