On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 15:33 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:12:28AM +0200, Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
> > diff -urp grub-1.96.orig/util/update-grub.in grub-1.96/util/update-grub.in
> > --- grub-1.96.orig/util/update-grub.in 2008-03-16 17:52:32.000000000
> > +0100
> > +++ grub-1.96/util/update-grub.in 2008-03-16 17:59:42.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
> > -grub_prefix=`echo /boot/grub | sed ${transform}`
> > +grub_prefix=/boot/`echo /grub | sed ${transform}`
>
> Is the second slash intentional?
No.
> > --- grub-1.96.orig/util/update-grub_lib.in.transform 2008-03-23
> > 11:46:14.000000000 +0100
> > +++ grub-1.96/util/update-grub_lib.in 2008-03-23 11:49:21.000000000
> > +0100
> > @@ -95,7 +95,8 @@
> > {
> > # Prefer system path for space reasons (/boot/grub might be a very small
> > # partition in case of OpenFirmware, etc).
> > - for dir in ${pkgdatadir} /usr/share/grub /boot/grub ; do
> > + for dir in ${pkgdatadir} ${pkgdatadir}/`echo grub | sed ${transform}` \
> > + /boot/`echo grub | sed ${transform}`; do
>
> I'd prefer is grub_prefix was defined here too (for readability).
Yep, there's space for improvement. See Pavel's reply to that mail.
Thanks,
--
Lubomir Kundrak (Red Hat Security Response Team)
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
