On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:18:10PM +0800, Bean wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 8:14 PM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:23:44PM -0800, walt wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 14:23 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 09:11:23AM -0800, walt wrote: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> > > > > >> In the course of actually trying to use the MultibootDraft, I've > > > > >> discovered > > > > >> some places where the draft and the grub2 implementation differ... > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > > > > > Are you using grub2/cvs with or without Bean's latest multiboot patch? > > > > > > > > I tend not to be aware of these things. I'm using stock sources. > > > > > > > > > It still hasn't been committed, and I was about to ask about it > > > > > anyway. > > > > > Without that patch, multiboot doesn't work. > > > > > > > > Hmm. > > > > > > Agreed :o) Bean's patch had some whitespace corruption anyway, so here > > > it is again, diffed against today's latest cvs grub2: > > > > If you just fixed whitespace, it is better if we just use patch -l or Bean > > fixes it. Otherwise it means more paperwork and legal stuff :-/ > > > > Bean, where you going to commit that patch? > > if the patch is ok, i can check it in.
Ok I just replied in the other thread. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
