The following function name: normal/main.c:read_config_file (const char *config, int nested)
is missleading. It does actually execute the config file, not just read it. Does it seem fine to rename it? How about `process_config_file' ? Or maybe I am missing something. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
