On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:32:36AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:38:31AM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: > >> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:44:51AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > >> >> > What do you suggest? > >> >> > >> >> I would prefer to have GRUB_MOD_GAP is all headers. Once it's not > >> >> needed, it could be removed across the board. > >> > > >> > Ok, does this seem fine? > >> > >> Am I missing something, or didn't you explain what GRUB_MOD_GAP is > >> supposed to do...? To be honest, I do not know what it is about. > > > > Pavel did. Check previous mails. > > I just see him raising his concerns. Or do I have to look at some > other thread?
"Testing on PowerMac G4" for the long explanation. A short explanation was committed in a C comment before GRUB_MOD_GAP definition. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
