Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:07:37PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: >> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Hi, >> >> > What do you think of adding this kind of checks? I know it's not a >> > perfect safegard, but it can save your day in some situations (it helped >> > me during i386/ieee1275 port, when link address was 0x100000). >> >> If this fixes the i386-ieee1275 port, this is fine to me. > > It isn't currently needed by either of the i386-ieee1275 targets (qemu and > xo). > > However, it was during an earlier stage of the port in which link address > was 0x100000 rather than 0x10000. > > My question is whether it makes sense as a general safety check.
Well, if it isn't going to occur with the current firmware implementations, I do not see the use. But it will not hurt either. Simply, I do not care either way... I leave this up to you ;-) -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
