Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:23:30PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote: >> > OFW expects %eax to be the first parameter in callbacks. Other than this, >> > I assumed -mregparm is a useful size optimization. Is that not it? Why >> > do we have it on i386-pc then? >> >> On i386-pc the size restrictions are more important. On OF the binary >> is loaded from the filesystem. > > We need at least -mregparm=1. Does it make sense to move from 3 to 1 ? I > think it's better to stay at 3 for consistency.
Sure. What you have is fine to me. >> >> Why do you do this? Isn't this information available in native byte >> >> order? >> > >> > See my other mail about IEEE-1275 and endianess. >> >> Which subject? > > "[PATCH] fix endianess in IEEE-1275 integer properties" Found and replied. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
