On Thursday 03 January 2008 16:28, Pavel Roskin wrote: > >> Linux style description. The first line is the synopsis. If it > >> doesn't fit 72 characters, the patch is a candidate for splitting. > >> Then an empty line. Then a more detailed description of the patch, > >> including the motivation behind the changes. The list of the affected > >> files can be generated by the version control system. > > > > Looks good. But I guess you'll have to convince Marco and Okuji > > about this :-) > > Sure, it's in my TODO list :)
I do not think automatically generated logs can be as precise as being made by human. Anyway, there is no reason that you shouldn't write a detailed description in ChangeLog. Indeed, I myself sometimes do that, when I make a big change or something hard to understand. Okuji _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
