adrian15 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've activated the echo command (also the pause command) which it is > equivalent to the echo command... and have done some tests:
The problem is in the parser. > grub> pause fjfjl > fjfjl > grub> pause "fjfjl" > fjfjl > grub> pause -n \n > error: Internal error > > grub> pause \n > error: Internal error > > grub> pause -n "\n" > \n > grub> pause -e "\n" > > grub> echo fasf > fasf > grub> > > > Two conclusions from these tests: > > 1) When you use \n in string that does not begin with " then it gives an > internal error. I do not see anything special on echo.c so I suppose > it's the fault of the parser, however I have not studied the parser > yet... so marco_g what's your opinnion? True, Bean sent in a patch to fix this. > 2) The -e option is not implemented. :) I've checked the code and it is > not. However I doubt if it's going to work... I ask myself if the grub> > string always appears at the beginning of the line. Do you want to implement this? ;-) This should not be hard to do. > pause is equivalent to echo command but if you want to check what I am > saying check my other email that contains a patch for having both echo > and pause commands. ok. -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel