On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 09:23:08PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Monday 07 May 2007 10:21, Robert Millan wrote: > > I think it would be reasonable to allow grub-probe to work without > > arguments. Any comments? > > Why do you think so?
Because it's commonly invoked while debugging. The uninitiated might have some trouble figuring out the right parameter (specialy if they're not debugging themselves, but providing information for someone else to debug e.g. via BTS). > If you want to omit the argument, I think the Unix way is > to default to current dir. I think that would make it even worse, because user might be in a directory that belongs to another filesystem and have no idea what is going on. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
