On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:54:41PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Tuesday 12 December 2006 21:56, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 06:31 +0100, Tristan Gingold wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 06:02:31PM -0600, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 06:09 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote: [...] > I am for making "type"s arbitrary. If one wants to use a "type" as an UUID, > she can. If one wants to use a "type" as a symbolic name, she can. I think it > is the most flexible and simplest way to make the interpretation of "type"s > up to the user. I am not against this proposal. I just could object we'd better to have a mechanism to avoid collision. If the "type" is a string collisions would appear really soon.
Tristan. _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
