On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:04 +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 20:09, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > > I am all for something that is simple. Initially it looked like > > > Hollis' proposal was more complex, but IIRC he mentioned he wanted to > > > work on making this easier to use. Isn't this what he did? Or did I > > > misunderstand something? If someone (Hollis in this case) thinks I am > > > wrong and comes with a good argumentation, I am always willing to > > > change my opinion. > > > > I already illustrated how easy it is: > > MB_HEADER() > > MB_START_TAGS() > > MB_LOADADDR(0x1234) > > MB_ENTRYADDR(0x1234) > > MB_END_TAGS() > > > > Please explain if you think this it too difficult. > > I have already said why this is not applicable to all users. > > > Note: I refuse to believe that ORing flags into a .long is less complex. > > I do, too. It is as as complex as using tags. So what?
I thought we had two options: embedding tags, or ORing bits into an embedded long. When I suggested embedding tags, you told me it was too complicated so will cause developer errors. Have I misunderstood? -Hollis _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
