On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:37:23AM +0200, Johan Rydberg wrote: > In other projects that I've worked on, we've used a system where the > core developers can either give a +1 or a -1 on a contributed patch. > If a patch receives two +1's or more, it is accepted (if there are no > -1's) and committed by one of the developers.
Do the core devs and maintainers not feel empowered to just commit the patch if they would otherwise +1 it? It seems like grub is a sufficiently small project that moves sufficiently slowly that rolling back a contentious patch would be easier than any sort of beaurocratic overhead. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- I do not agree with a word you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. - Voltaire _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
