On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:46:37PM +0200, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > On Sunday 30 July 2006 19:29, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > set -e; gcc -Ihello -I./hello -I. -Iinclude -I./include -Wall -W > > -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes > > -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -g -Os -fno-builtin -M hello/hello.c | > > sed 's,hello\.o[ :]*,hello_mod-hello_hello.o hello_mod-hello_hello.d : ,g' > > > hello_mod-hello_hello.d; [ -s hello_mod-hello_hello.d ] || rm -f > > hello_mod-hello_hello.d In file included from include/grub/normal.h:28, > > from hello/hello.c:27: > > include/grub/script.h:27:29: error: grub_script.tab.h: No such file or > > directory > > > > Generates a zero-byte file which is promptly deleted. So this file is > > never generated. > > I took a look at the log. It says that the dependency generation fails at the > first time, as grub_script.tab.h does not exist, but it is performed again > after grub_script.tab.h is generated. Doesn't this happen in your > environment?
Nope, grub_script.tab.h is never generated on my system. It looks like on other arch's it's generated as a side effect of programs defined in conf/*. Because I'm still trying to get the base set of things built, the missing dependancy causes me grief. That's why I think it needs an added dependancy. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- I do not agree with a word you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. - Voltaire _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
