On Friday 21 Oct 2005 23:18, Marco Gerards wrote: > Why did you choose this name? What about using grub_sector_t instead > as name?
I now see Linux uses sector_t. Revised patch using grub_sector_t and definition higher up types.h: http://www.majoroak.f2s.com/tim/grub/patches/grub2-patch14b.diff.gz It needs testing on PowerPC and SPARC. > I still have to look at the RISC OS patches you sent in so far. I > hope you can still wait a bit, my own hacking already consumes all > time I have... :-/. Sorry for this very long delay. I've merged some bug fixes into the patches they correct, and added rules for your parser. See: http://www.majoroak.f2s.com/tim/grub/RISC_OS/ Good luck with your exams. -- Member AFFS, WYLUG, SWP (UK), UAF, RESPECT, StWC No to software patents! Victory to the iraqi resistance!
pgpFUkhUWUlzl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel