I just moved this discussion to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/grpc-io. While this might be useful to Java and Go, I'll the scope of this proposal to C-core and wrapped languages, to focus on the external-memory and garbage collection interaction issue.
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 8:38:11 PM UTC-8, Vijay Pai wrote: > > Can I suggest retitling as L rather than A as described? If this is for > core, then it affects the C++ core and languages derived from it, but not > all languages. OTOH, if you want to keep it an A, then there should perhaps > also be a new API proposal attached for Java and Go to also expose this > info (and maybe this is a good idea anyway) > > On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 10:35:26 PM UTC-6, [email protected] > wrote: >> >> https://github.com/grpc/proposal/pull/55 >> >> On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 8:29:06 PM UTC-8, [email protected] >> wrote: >>> >>> This is a thread to discuss the gRFC proposal. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/7d479884-592c-4dee-95d8-fe179b6bed4f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
