Moin, > A draft proposal is available here: > https://github.com/boucadair/WG-Charters/blob/main/grow-032025.md
What I see from a diff (roughly): - Measurement - VPN (So, essentially, DC-BGP) + IGP/EGP interaction + Increase awareness for mitigations (Not develop) + Develop models/tech for automation + More operations terminology + "Agenda time at GROW sessions at IETF meetings should allow for presentations and discussions of operator issues and experience, and other work within scope for the working group, but with a default expectation that priority be given to operator presentations." My main concern would be with the last sentence, as this wording makes GROW sound more like an RG (presenting experience reports etc.) than a group focused on creating documents/guidance, which the milestones currently mostly list. Questions would be, whether that is a desired outcome. Otherwise language like: "Agenda time at GROW sessions at IETF meetings should allow for presentations and discussions of operators' issues and experiences in relation to work within scope for the working group. Priority should be given to presentations that either directly contribute to documents on solutions for challenges they face, or that add further context to known challenges faced by operators." # Nits: - 'GROW working group': GROW working group indeed reads better than GROW (Global Routing Operations Workinggroup) ;-) With best regards, Tobias > Your comments and feedback are most welcome! > > Kind regards, > > Job & Chris > co-chairs GROW > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list -- grow@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M tob...@fiebig.nl _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- grow@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org
