Hi Job, Stavros, and Mo,

FWIW, you may find a review of this document at:

  *   pdf: 
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/2025/draft-ietf-grow-ixp-ext-comms-01-rev%20Med.pdf
  *   doc: 
https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/2025/draft-ietf-grow-ixp-ext-comms-01-rev%20Med.doc

One procedural comment about the proposed changes to RFC 7948 (Informational): 
Did the group discuss whether these changes be removed from the reco (which 
targets a BCP) and include these in a  RFC7948bis (with any other updates the 
WG may have queued since 2016)? It is weird to mix info vs. bcp parts in one 
single doc ;-)

Also, I wonder whether the proposed reco was reviewed by other IXPs other than 
the authors?

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list -- grow@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to