Rather than attempt to spoon-feed a reader with a long list of detailed tasks that is most likely incomplete and will be quickly overtaken by subsequent changes in the operational environment, it's more useful to elevate the level of the document and describe what these operational security measures are trying to achieve and just leave it at that. This seems like a far more useful approach to me.
Geoff On 28 Jun 2024, at 4:46 PM, Tobias Fiebig <tobias=40fiebig...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Moin, as discussed in Brisbane, Nick and I cut down the draft significantly, to focus on the essentials. We would appreciate to hear feedback from the WG on whether this goes into the right direction. With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M tob...@fiebig.nl _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- grow@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- grow@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org
