Hi,

I'm trying hard to have reproducible builds, so that I can verify that
my build system produces the same exact thing as long as the tools used
with it are the same (or a reasonably similar version).

I found that groff(1) doesn't seem to be consistent, as it produces
slightly different output on different runs.  Here's just an example:

        $ diff -u \
                
~/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/main/.tmp/man/man5/proc_pid_maps.5.html.set \
                
~/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/contrib/.tmp/man/man5/proc_pid_maps.5.html.set;
        --- 
/home/alx/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/main/.tmp/man/man5/proc_pid_maps.5.html.set
 2025-09-10 21:53:54.548437735 +0200
        +++ 
/home/alx/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/contrib/.tmp/man/man5/proc_pid_maps.5.html.set
      2025-09-11 10:28:21.890523032 +0200
        @@ -11,10 +11,7 @@
         x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/en.tmac
         x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/pspic.tmac
         x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/pdfpic.tmac
        -x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/an.tmac
        -x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/devtag.tmac
        -x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/an-ext.tmac
        -x F /usr/share/groff/site-tmac/man.local
        +x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/andoc.tmac
         x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/troffrc-end
         x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/html-end.tmac
         p1
        @@ -26,6 +23,10 @@
         x F -
         x F -
         x F .tmp/man/man5/proc_pid_maps.5
        +x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/an.tmac
        +x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/devtag.tmac
        +x F /usr/share/groff/1.23.0/tmac/an-ext.tmac
        +x F /usr/share/groff/site-tmac/man.local
         V80
         H0
         x X devtag:.fi 1

Did I inadvertently do something that would trigger such a difference?
I used the same exact system to produce both files.  I was testing that
some changes to the Linux man-pages build system (which are just
cosmetic changes) are in fact cosmetic, so I'm surprised to see these
changes.

Is groff(1) just random in some sense?  Would it be possible to remove
that randomness from groff(1)?


Have a lovely day!
Alex

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to