On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 12:24:23AM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Branden, > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 04:32:34PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > > > At 2025-09-18T22:50:42+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 03:19:52PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > I have to admit I haven't put a priority on this, due to a few > > > > factors. > > > > > > > > 1. No exogenous factor is pressing to bump our gnulib submodule to > > > > the 2025-07 stable tag. However, that tag _is_ almost three > > > > months old, and I can't delay forever because gnulib > > > > releases/tags have a lifespan of only 1 year. > > > > > > When 202601 is out, you'll get streq() and memeq(), and I'll send > > > patches for them. :) > > > > Looking forward to that--those should have been in libc in the 1980s! I
Well, not since 1980, but BitKeeper has had all that stuff for 20-25 years: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/src/libc/style.h > Heh! There's still people in the C Committee that doesn't like them. There are people on the C committee that shouldn't be there. No smiley.
