> +       GNU troff offers the `char` request, enabling a document to
> +       define `\[ru]` as equivalent to `_` if it wishes.

Since this is a new requirement for documents that want this mapping,
whereas it used to happen by default, wouldn't this warrant a NEWS
item?  It's a minor change, but it *is* a change in the behavior of
over 20 years.  What threshold is generally used for this?

Reply via email to