Hi onf, On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 09:17:56PM +0100, onf wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Sun Feb 9, 2025 at 8:11 PM CET, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > This is off-topic, but I don't know where to ask. > > > > Thing is, I found a bug in a Plan9 string API: seprintf(2). > > I discussed the bug with Doug some time ago, and ISTR that we agreed > > that the API has a design bug. And we might be able to fix it. But I > > don't know who maintains that code. I think I eventually sent a main to > > some mailing list I found in the internet about Plan9, but nobody > > responded. Does anyone have contacts that I can talk to about it? > > [...] > > AFAIK the only maintained version of Plan9 is 9front. > > http://lists.9front.org/ > > You might be able to get some direct contact info by cloning > git://git.9front.org/plan9front/plan9front > and running git blame on /sys/src/libc/fmt/seprint.c [1] > > Good luck.
Thanks! That will work. > > ~ onf > > [1] I assume you meant seprint, not seprintf, which seems non-existent. Yep. seprintf() is my own API similar to seprint(2) but without the flaws. I meant seprint(2). Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
