FWIW, I noticed that "ang" which is groff's \(/_ has a certain line thickness. However, "rang" which is constructed from "|" and \(ru is much thinner, almost half of "ang" If I made it "fat", its lines are about the same thickness as those of "ang". My 2c. Or maybe I need glasses - Damian
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar G. Branden Robinson
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqncha... G. Branden Robinson
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin