At 2023-06-12T19:35:11-0400, Peter Schaffter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > At 2023-06-09T02:02:48-0400, Peter Schaffter wrote: > > > Hmm... It might be a subtle point, but mom already compensates > > > for it any time \D't n' is used to set line weight in a macro. > > > > Ah. Unless you compensated with \Z'\D't n'', then it sounds like I > > need to sync my pending fix for Savannah #64285 with a change to the > > mom macros so that no regression is perceived. > > I've tweaked things so that all calls to \D't n' in the mom macros > are inside \Z' '. The changes will be in my next commit.
Cool. > > ...I think we should pull this [i.e. registering vertical motions > > of \D escapes inside diversions] down into the formatter and > > coordinate a cut-over to keep mom documents formatting happily. > > But for the broader issue, I have no time frame and no estimates. > > As concerns the vertical motions of \D escapes not being added to > \n[.d], I was referring to \n[dn], but I should check what happens to `.d` as well--thanks for pointing this out. > it will be trivial to update mom whenever you get around to tackling > the issue at the formatter level. That's good news. This issue may take longer to figure out: what _other_ things should be updating the diversion height but don't? Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
