Ralph, At 2022-05-23T10:34:44+0100, Ralph Corderoy wrote: [Ingo wrote:] > > The typical use case is in a tagged list that uses normal vertical > > spacing in general, but contains a few entries that need two or more > > tags for a few of the list entries. For example, in a csh(1) > > manual page, you might say something like: > > > > .TP > > \fBcd\fP [\fIname\fP] > > .TQ > > \fBchdir\fP [\fIname\fP] > > Change the shell's working directory to ... > > .TP > > .B continue > > Continue execution of the nearest enclosing > > .B while > > or ... [...] > Wouldn't one just wrap the .TP paragraph in a pair of .PDs? > > .TP > \fBbreak\fR \*(OK\fIn\fR\*(CK > Exit from the enclosing... > . > .TP > \fBcd\fP [\fIname\fP] > .PD 0 > .TP > \fBchdir\fP [\fIname\fP] > Change the shell's working directory to... > .PD > . > .TP > .B continue > Continue execution of the nearest enclosing...
Yes, that is precisely the form that Alejandro offered when inquiring about this subject in the original post to the thread. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2022-05/msg00022.html You have on multiple occasions complained of my emails being wordy. In that light it is brow-raising to see you recapitulate messages that were sent to this list less than three days ago. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
