hello, > Then you only had a very superficial look at DocBook.
i was switching from plain texts to html and using my own classnames in span, div and p tags to have my own semantic. having a standard way to do it really helped but i'll probably be much more demanding nowadays. > https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20190419101505 thanks for the link. i postpone the reading to friday so i can read it correctly. > But the many specific ways in which DocBook is ill-designed > are much worse than the fact that it uses XML. :) > there is no need to do that work because both the roff(7) > and the TeX markup language frameworks are clearly superior > to XML. agree with that. i really was thinking about the semantic but i have to admit i don't even remember how to set a title in docbook. also: thanks for the very informative answers you gave to my questions. i have nothing left to comment or ask anymore. cheers, marc
