> What would you think about changing the - admittedly venerable - > policy in this respect? About shifting the top priority onto making > the meaning unambiguous in -Tascii output, and only pick a similar > graphical shape if that does not endanger properly conveying the > meaning?
I support that. On the other hand, if you use -Tascii instead of -Tutf8 today you get what you deserve :-) Werner