Eh, that's a good point, actually. Not to mention the name is a little misleading in sounding like a replica of `nroff`.
I'll probably split it into two modules, one called "roff" that provides the "lower-level" functionality I described, and another called "man-pages" that uses it for easy/obvious manpage generation. On 28 November 2016 at 12:54, Larry Kollar <larry.kol...@me.com> wrote: > > > Peter Schaffter <pe...@schaffter.ca> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016, John Gardner wrote: > >> ...I've decided the project *will *be named on NPM as *nroff*, > >> with the human-readable title being "Node-Roff". Since any > >> *reasonable* person can see why that's an appropriate name for a > >> *node-based roff* generator. > > > > For all that I appreciate the nod towards history, I'm not sure it's > > a good idea to muddy the roff-nroff-troff-groff waters further by > > choosing nroff. My two cents. > > I agree. If it’s node-*based* roff, why not nbroff instead? > > Larry > > >
