Steffen Nurpmeso <sdao...@yandex.com> wrote:

> But i would prefer if the roff's could stay in sync somewhat.
> Noone wins if this diverges even more.

That had been my preference too.  But I'm not convinced of that new syntax, I'd 
like to stay with which is well known to all *roff users (that means ".if N" 
and adding number expression improvements).  Regex fits well into that.

Carsten

Reply via email to