On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:31:48 +0100 Tadziu Hoffmann <hoffm...@usm.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:
>
> > > So the default groff behavior of adding additional space
> > > between sentences also does not follow today's typical US
> > > typography. You would have to specify ".ss 12 0" to achieve
> > > US convention.
>
> > It seems ease of reading or better comprehension (which are
> > the reasons I prefer extra space after sentences, etc.) have
> > nothing to do with "the rules."
> > Sigh.
>
> The situation is even worse. I've recently read a novel where
> (particularly noticeable in tightened-up lines) the space
> after a sentence-period was *reduced* compared to the normal
> word-spacing on the same line. It appears the attitude is that
> all the empty space above the period is already room enough.
> Sheesh.
I've seen that same thing. Worse, it was on a line where there
was a space after a comma that was _wider_ than a normal
inter-sentence space. Say _what_?! Or my other favorite, from a
different publishing house: A closing double quote that _starts_ a
line.
I read on somebody's blog that no _professional_ typographer would
use such low-capability software as *roff or TeX. Well, if this
is what their thousand-dollar-per-seat, "quality," "professional"
software puts out, I'll stick with Groff. I used to think that
the professional typographers knew more than I do about
typography. I still do. Many of the folks here are lightyears
beyond me. But I am wondering if the publishing houses are hiring
professionals anymore.
.RANT OFF
Sorry for the noise, but that's something that's been bothering me
lately. To make up for it, here's something I have in my personal
Groff macros:
.char \[:] \^:\|\: \&
for an old-fasioned colon. Just 'cause I'm an old curmudgeon.
Humbug! to the new-fangled colons. Humbug! I say! :-)
--Dale
--
"Don't only practice your Art, but force your way into its
Secrets, for it and Knowledge can raise Men to the Divine."
-- Ludwig van Beethoven
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
