> I'm curious, though, why \s can not support the no-argument form in > the same way that \f and \F do.
Why should it? \s always needs a numerical value, where 0 is a natural default. On the other hand, \f and \F expect strings, where the natural default is the empty one. Werner _______________________________________________ bug-groff mailing list bug-gr...@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff