> I'm curious, though, why \s can not support the no-argument form in
> the same way that \f and \F do.

Why should it?  \s always needs a numerical value, where 0 is a
natural default.  On the other hand, \f and \F expect strings, where
the natural default is the empty one.


    Werner

_______________________________________________
bug-groff mailing list
bug-gr...@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-groff

Reply via email to