On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Larry Kollar <kol...@windstream.net> wrote:
> For most of what Author-It does, we could have done it a lot cheaper and with > much higher performance by deploying a CVS server on the network and using > groff. Is the suggestion to use `CVS server' as an alternative just a particularly horrible insult for Author-It, or does it also betray a misguided appreciation for groff?
