On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Tadziu Hoffmann <hoffm...@usm.uni-muenchen.de> wrote: > >> Macros come closer to "structural", but really aren't. > > I disagree. There is no principal difference between > > All your base > .EMPH are > belong to us! > > and > > All your base <emphasis>are</emphasis> belong to us! > > It's a purely a matter of syntax, not intent.
That's because your example is cherry-picked and disingenuous (or naive). Structure implies abstraction, which implies a directed acyclic graph of concepts.
