On Sunday 06 Mar 2011 14:24:06 Deri James wrote: > Does my analysis make sense? Is it desirable to make \X et al "transparent" > so this effect won't happen. Will it break something else? Will I be able > to work out how to "fix" it? (That last one is sort of rhetorical - you > don't have to answer!!). >
Many thanks to Werner who answered my question off list. The correct way to do what I want (talk to the post processor transparently) is to use ".output" or "\!" (at the top level). so:- 1. .br .output x X ps: .br. 2. works lovely - thanks Werner Cheers Deri
