> Well, the AT&T mm macros define .TP with the standard top-of-page > processing (the mgm macros do not), which is more in keeping with my > original proposal to define .EOP with the standard end-of-page > processing. Does that change anyone's mind about the correct > approach? It makes sense to me to use the same approach for both.
Please go ahead. My knowledge of mm is rather limited, and basically
I just do educated guesses.
Werner
