I was looking over the web to see if I could find any notes on how the mm macros stack implementation (which confused me) worked, when I found the reference to the manpage groff-www. I hadn't realized it existed, and it showed me a lot of work by Larry Kollar about stacks, and his code made more sense to me.
It sure looks like, if I didn't make a mistake in my test code, then it's going to be a whole lost easier to make small fixes in the www.tmac than big fixes in mm.tmac, and only have reassignment of macros (in the case of -Thtml) in the mm.tmac. All the stack stuff exists, just it needs to more correctly end the html tags, for list embedding to work better. Is this maybe making any more sense? Or, does anyone else disagree with me, that using the www.tmac macros to set up multiple level html lists doesn't work? I don't want to fix something that isn't actually broken, and I've got a whole lot less experience with this www.tmac than some of you. Understand, I mean that top level lists work great, but doing something like embedding an ordered list inside a definition list is broke (the ending of the ordered list is wrong).
