Folks,
look at this minimal example file `xxx':
.de foo
..
.als bar foo
.de bar
. foo
..
.bar
What do you expect? Current reality is that troff bombs out with
xxx:7: fatal error: input stack limit exceeded (probable infinite loop)
[It took me *hours* to discover this while trying to fix a bug which
currently prevents correct compilation of pic.html and
webpage.html...]
My expectation was that `.de' would be stronger than `.als', and my
first reaction was to fix this in the source accordingly. However,
what should be done if you replace `.de bar' with `.am bar' (and a
non-recursive contents, of course)?
BTW, the documentation says
-- Request: .als new old
Create an alias named NEW for the request, string, macro, or
diversion object named OLD. The new name and the old name are
exactly equivalent (it is similar to a hard rather than a soft
link). [...]
I now tend to say that troff's behaviour is a feature. If you insert
.rm bar
right before the definition of `bar', the example works as expected.
Werner
