> >> If you could manage avoiding ‘cooking’ with a a ’one-part series’
> >> (Schemes 3 and 4), that would be GREAT. Then I would not even mind
> >> if I could not understand its working :-)
> >
> > Hehe. This would need a new command in groff, and I'm not sure
> > whether it's worth the trouble.
>
> This could have been an opportunity to put some more serious
> graphics into groff, but that's your call.
Hmm, what do you mean with `more serious graphics'? What operation do
you have in mind which can't be done with the scheme I propose?
Werner
