On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 05:50:28PM +0200, Gunnar Ritter wrote: > M Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 01:52:04AM +0200, Gunnar Ritter wrote: > > > : > > > All variants of the original -mm which I have seen so far > > > have been very similar. It is likely that they all use the > > > :p register in the same way. > > > > One definition of backward compatibility is "All Bugs Are Preserved". > > Err - but where is the bug here?
No, not that I am aware of. I was attempting a joke/turism. > > So I ask the question of the group: > > > > Do we want to implement "backward compatibility" of undocumented > > things like the number register :p in the groff package? > > > > I vote no. > > I personally do not care. I will always keep "my" variant > of -mm ... > : > Gunnar I count that as an "abstain" vote. -- Mike Bianchi Foveal Systems 973 822-2085 call to arrange Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.AutoAuditorium.com http://www.FovealMounts.com
