Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2007-08-27 00:08 +0200: > - At many places you put a hyphen ('-', yields '‐') where a hyphen-minus > sign ('\-', yields '-') would be more appropriate. Especially in > command-line options. The hyphens not only look strange in command-line > options, they also don't work:
Forgive me for poking my nose in here, but I wanted to ask about that particular problem in order to make sure I have the DocBook manpages stylesheet doing what it should. So, to be clear, is the following description correct? If you put a U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS character into the source for a groff file, in certain environments (e.g., in a UTF-8 environment), it will get output as a U+2010 HYPHEN character. And, by the way, if the above is correct, is there a documented rationale for why groff outputs a U+2010 for it instead of a U+002D? (Some Unicode recommendation?) --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature