> Your suggestion is a good idea! Different macro packages do handle > .EQ and .EN in different ways (while ms and me are similar, mm is > different, for instance). So it is useful to know what is possible > for each different macro set. > > However, I'm doubtful about what you write at the end of your > suggested inclusion (see below).
Ted, can you prepare a patch for both groff_ms.man and groff.texinfo,
relative to the current CVS?
Werner
